The terrible lie Harriette Wilson (a real Regency courtesan) told in her memoirs

Harriette_Wilson00Last week I discussed whether or not Harriette Wilson’s memoirs were true. This week I will share two of the lies she told. They are the most heart-wrenching lies I have ever heard. I cried when I found out about this. The truth is really disturbing. But before I tell you the truth, here is the background for this short series of posts looking behind Harriette Wilson’s memoirs to discover the things she didn’t say. If you’ve already read this, read on from the line of bold type.

If you have been following my blog for a little while, you will know that Harriette Wilson, the real Regency courtesan who published her memoirs in 1825 as a kiss and tell series, inspired the first novel in the Marlow Intrigues series, The Illicit Love of a Courtesan, I have been sharing the version of her life she told in her memoirs here for about a year, but over that year so many times people have told me – but it’s known she lied in them.

Well recently, I discovered the work of someone who has researched Harriette’s real life, and so I can now share with you some of the things she did not include.

As to whether or not she lied, well I will also cover that… But… I will say now, I have used her memoirs as a wealth of insight into the Regency world, her writing is like looking in through a window to see how life was for someone who lived then, and yes, you can definitely spot the scenes where there is some embellishment, either because she was writing for an audience, or because she wished to hurt someone who had hurt her… But overall, many of her scenes are from truth. Plenty more of this in the next couple of weeks, including some insights which I have found really upsetting.

Gosh, I was so upset by this story, that I have no idea how to begin…

Okay, just begin…

I first read Harriette Wilson’s memoirs, published in 1825, probably nearly ten years ago, and when I read them the part I found most  moving, was her relationship with Lord Ponsonby. Harriette fell in love. There is no doubt about that. It was not a lie.

It was this part of her memoirs that inspired me to write the first novel I succeeded in publishing. The Illicit Love of a Courtesan… So that is partly why I have found the true story she didn’t tell, compared to the lies she wrote, really upsetting. Because it was this part of her personal story that made me want to write a happy ending for a courtesan who fell in love…. Harriette’s real love affair had a terrible ending…

In her memoirs, Harritte tells her readers that she fell in love with Lord Ponsonby when she did not even know who he was. She saw him in Hyde Park, walking his dog. Throwing a stick for it. Once she’d seen Lord Ponsonby, she went back to the park night after night, with anyone who she could persuade to accompany her, or even alone… just to see him. Then she found out where he lived and followed him. For weeks this non-relationship persisted. She was in love, but she had not even spoken to him. But then one day, he rode past her house on his horse. She ran up to the roof of her house so she could spy on him, and saw him turn his horse at the end of the street and ride back along it, past her house.

That was Harriette’s first indication that Lord Ponsonby returned her interest.

At the time I think Harriette was in her early twenties, certainly she was young, she might have even only been nineteen, but she was at the height of her fame. She was well-known, and embedded among the most senior members of the aristocracy in Britain. It was when he attended the opera, that she discovered his name, and then she wrote a letter to him, and he wrote a letter back to her. Then he came to meet her… They did not make love on the first occasion, he was too tired, he had been sitting at his father’s bedside, night after night, through a long period of ill-health. But the next time he visited Harriette, she records the visit as something extremely special.

Throughout her memoirs she refers to Lord Ponsonby as the only man she truly loved. She constantly looks back to the three years she spent with him as the best time of her life, and compares every man who came after him to him.  He became her yard stick of what she was looking for in a man, and no one successfully competed. (okay so maybe you can hear a little reflection of Robert in The Passionate Love of a Rake – yes Harriette’s voice and memoirs have influenced an awful lot in my books).

So why did she part from him, well here is the lie… She said in her memoirs he developed a conscience and decided to end their affair so he could be faithful to his young, beautiful, wife.

He did not end their affair for that reason.

So how do we know the truth? Lord Ponsonby was a man who kept his letters, and in the collection of letters at his stately home, are letters between himself and others, and even from Harriette to him. So there is not doubt at all about the real truth Harriette did not tell.

Frances Wilson researched and published the truth in 2004. Frances’s view on Harriette’s words about her love affair with Lord Ponsonby was that Harriette did not know how to write about it, so she stole a style of writing from other works and used that in her memoirs. I don’t think that. The language Harriette uses in her memoirs always changes when she mentions Lord Ponsonby, her words become heartfelt, because they were heartfelt, he broke her heart. Not only that but he ripped it in half and ripped it out… and left her in pain for the rest of her life.

The love she had for him, had been love at first sight, and right from the beginning it was that all-consuming love that can turn a sensible person – possessive, jealous and even deranged… She was MAD for him, and that is the position she writes from. I guess maybe you can only really understand that sort of love, that can endure for a lifetime, even if the person was cruel to you and let you down irrevocably, if you have experienced it. I have, and I can hear that in Harriette’s words.

So what was the truth that Frances discovered. Harriette did have a three-year relationship with him. They were close, so close he told Harriette secrets about a former mistress of his, and gave Harriette letters from a former lover, so at some part of their relationship, he had thrown his whole self into it. But I would say it is extremely unlikely that he actually loved her back.

Did she watch him in Hyde Park for weeks before she spoke to him? Probably yes, certainly letters he had kept from friends tease him about the things Harriette wrote about him. So it is likely that they could well be true.

When they parted did she refuse to take an envelope containing the money he owed her as an end-of-relationship-settlement? That we also know is true, as I said last week, when she was writing to him asking for money at the point she published her memoirs, she raises this money that she did not take from him at the point they separated.

Did that conversation take place in the early hours of the morning in a carriage outside Parliament, as Harriette said it did, after she had sat and waited for him in his carriage, while he attended Parliament? We don’t know.

Was he agitated the day he parted from her, and quieter than normal all day, so that she sensed something was wrong but did not know what? Again we don’t know.

Did she know the true reason why he was leaving her at the point he did? We don’t know.

But what we do know – is that he did not leave her to be more loyal to his wife. He left her to commence an affair with Harriette’s quite possibly virgin, thirteen year old sister…  Sophia!

Yes, that sister…

I said at some point when I was retelling Harriette’s memoirs, that so much of what she said about Sophia rang with nastiness, that I was never sure if it was true. Again, my only judgement was based on the style of language Harriette used, but whenever she speaks of Sophia,she is vicious in a really strange way… Well now I know why!

IMG_4727In her memoirs, Harriette said that Sophia was stolen from the nest at her parents’ house, at the age of thirteen by Lord  Deerhurst, who followed her around and tempted her away with valueless trinkets. That was clearly not true. Lord Ponsonby came before Lord Deerhurst. So was Lord Ponsonby a seducer, did he go out of his way to win over a naive thirteen year old. Or had Sophia already made up her mind to follow the path of her sisters. Frances implies, Sophia had already made the decision, but she doesn’t evidence that… I am not convinced. Lord Ponsonby could easily have met Sophia through Harriette, he obviously liked young women,even his wife was young. So perhaps he fancied plucking Sophia before anyone else could.

Harriette constantly depicts Sophia as dull,  stupid, and having no wit at all. Yet Sophia did win Lord Ponsonby from Harriette who was known for being an extremely fun girl to be with. Harriette swore like the men, and cracked jokes like the men, as well as being able to do all the ladylike things. She loved her pianoforte. I was never sure if anything

Attingham Park - Sophia's - Lady Berwick's home

Attingham Park – Sophia’s – Lady Berwick’s home

she wrote about Sophia was true, because it sounded so callous and twisted. Now I am even less sure. Sophia, may well have been bright and utterly charming. Sophia is the sister who also went on to win respectability, to marry a Baron, and live in a huge stately home at Attingham Park, and bankrupt her husband.

Harriette must have truly hated her… I have never seen where the story comes from. But there is a story, which I am sure is true, that sitting in a box above Sophia at the opera, Harriette spat on her hair. I had thought it was done out of jealousy, now I understand why. Sophia stole the man Harriette loved. Many men passed between the sisters in the time they were working, but Harriette did not keep her infatuation for Lord Ponsonby a secret, and this for her was different from sharing a man she was indifferent to.

Quite frankly I don’t blame Harriette at all… :/

Frances Wilson also records that the first episode of Harriette’s memoirs were delayed for a considerable period, because Sophia was in consultation with the publisher, about a sum to take her name out of Harriette’s book. I wonder if Harriette’s answer then was to write a vicious fairytale of lies for her sister, if she wrote lies, she could take out the truth and be paid for it, but still ruin her sister’s respectability and have some form of revenge.

But then… As I said last week… Lord Ponsonby was out of the country when Harriette published the part about him. He did not have chance to buy his name out at that point, and even when he was threatened by Harriette, that she might tell stories about the other women he’d had affairs with, he refused to pay up, and there are letters from him to his friends, telling people to give her nothing… So he definitely did not pay her, or her publisher, any money.

Why then did she not at least tell the truth about him?

I wish I knew for certain, I don’t.

But my guess…

Okay, so if Sophia bought the truth out of the memoirs… you say of course Harriette could not have included it. But why not show the same vindictiveness for Lord Ponsonby that she did for Sophia then?

One word LOVE. She still loved him. She still would have taken him back if he’d wanted her. The letters she wrote to him, when he returned after her memoirs were published, which he kept, all allude to the fact she still had feelings for him.

I shared one letter last week, where she declared if he said on his word he did not have two hundred, she would accept one. Because she was always kinder and more considerate of Lord Ponsonby. She was still in love, even after him leaving her for a sister who was younger – still a child really. Even twenty years on from when it had happened.

How heartbreaking is that?

I think I find it so particularly moving because having lived with Harriette through her words for years, to discover this horrible secret that she kept to herself, is really sad.

But Lord Ponsonby must have been one of those men who was very clever at charming women, as his other former mistress Lady Conyngham, who was now the mistress of the King, and whose letters Harriette had been given and still kept, when she was told the King had sent Lord Ponsonby abroad to help silence Harriette’s threats, someone recorded at the time.  ‘Lady C, throws herself back on the sofa and never speaks, and the opinion is (which I don’t believe) that she hates kingy.’

What truths do we know. Frances Wilson quotes a letter Harriette wrote to Lord Byron, dated 1823, which is still in existence. ‘Lord, if you could only suffer for one single day the agony of mind I endured for more than two years after Ponsonby left me… you would bless your stars and your good fortune, blind, deaf and lame, at eighty-two, so that you could sleep an hour in forgetfulness or eat a little bit of batter pudding. Heavens! How I have prayed for death, nights and days and months together, merely as a rest from suffering...’

And there is a letter to Lord Ponsonby dated 1832, ‘My indignation expressed in many letters is quite real and quite natural  – were I to swear to you that I considered your conduct (in cutting me to attach a young stupid sister not half as handsome) with my feeling short of strong resentment and disgust you would not (if you know anything of human nature) behave thus – during three months of severe painful illness – I had time for reflection- and with a good deal of benevolence in my motive I could not but wish to think of you with less bitterness and dislike. It mattered not to you my opinion – but to myself hate was feverish and a bore. The result of calm candid inward reasoning on the subject brought me to this conclusion...’

Sorry that is not me ending it there, but Frances Wilson… But I think the conclusion is – she forgave him…

And why on earth write and say that so many years after the event, unless you are still carrying a torch Harriette?

So many times when I read historical true stories, I see incorrect judgements made, as people do not understand the world that person was living in… But here, in this…Harriette’s long lasting pain, her broken heart, and her hatred of her sister, and her undying love for Lord Ponsonby are obvious…

I am glad I did not know this truth when I read Harriette’s memoirs. The Illicit Love of a Courtesan was inspired by the adoration and infatuation she felt for Lord Ponsonby – these were words I read between her lines… I would not have been moved to write the story of Ellen Harding, in The Illicit Love of a Courtesan, if I’d known their story ended with so much pain…

John Ponsonby, you are a complete and utter blackguard! If I ever come across your grave I shall dance a jig on it!

~

There won’t be a Harriette post for a couple of weeks, as I am away, but  when I am back I’ll share how Harriette spent the rest of her life after she wrote her memoirs… Did she have a happy ending of her own after all?

~

Jane Lark is a writer of authentic, passionate and emotional Historical and New Adult Romance stories, and the author of a No.1 bestselling Historical Romance novel in America, ‘The Illicit Love of a Courtesan’.

Look at the index to discover all the true stories Jane has discovered during research, and to find links to excerpts and a FREE novella ~ A Lord’s Desperate Love

Click here to find out more about Jane’s books, and see Jane’s website www.janelark.co.uk to learn more about Jane. Or click  ‘like’ on Jane’s Facebook  page to see photo’s and learn historical facts from the Georgian, Regency and Victorian eras, which Jane publishes there. You can also follow Jane on twitter at @janelark

 

 

Harriette Wilson – a Regency courtesan’s memoirs – Truth or lies


Harriette_Wilson00
So this week, I am going to tackle the question that everyone has been throwing at me since I started sharing Harriette Wilson’s stories. Are they true?

Well, there is no doubt at all that Harriette was really a courtesan, as I said last week, the start of her career is even recorded in a letter by Jane Austen, but how much of her memoirs are the truth…

Before I look at that though here is a little background to this short series of posts looking at the reality of Harriette Wilson’s historic memoirs. If you’ve already read this, read on from the line of bold type.

If you have been following my blog for a little while, you will know that Harriette Wilson, the real Regency courtesan who published her memoirs in 1825 as a kiss and tell series, inspired the first novel in the Marlow Intrigues series, The Illicit Love of a Courtesan, I have been sharing the version of her life she told in her memoirs here for about a year, but over that year so many times people have told me – but it’s known she lied in them.

Well recently, I discovered the work of someone who has researched Harriette’s real life, and so I can now share with you some of the things she did not include.

As to whether or not she lied, well I will also cover that… But… I will say now, I have used her memoirs as a wealth of insight into the Regency world, her writing is like looking in through a window to see how life was for someone who lived then, and yes, you can definitely spot the scenes where there is some embellishment, either because she was writing for an audience, or because she wished to hurt someone who had hurt her… But overall, many of her scenes are from truth. Plenty more of this in the next couple of weeks, including some insights which I have found really upsetting.

I guess the first questions is, how can we even know what is truth or lies?

The answer, other letters and memoirs written in the same period.

Frances Wilson researched Harriette’s life a few years ago, and found letters kept which tell her story outside of her memoirs.

When Harriette made the decision to write down her history, there were a few reasons – her fame was dying out, she was getting older and losing her looks, but she also did believe she had a literary talent, and therefore writing her memoirs was a way for her to regain her fame, and express how clever she thought she was. But also it was simply to raise money. She lived an expensive lifestyle, and with no wealthy protector, she needed an income… And what better way to fund her lifestyle, than by making the men who now overlooked her, but had spent years using her, pay.

At this point in her life, she was no longer acting as a courtesan or living among the elite, but living with a con-man called Rochfort, the nephew of an Earl, in Paris. He had no inheritance, and lived only on his wits, so they had little money. She’d taken his name and said she was married, but there is no evidence she had legally married him.

Harriette’s memoirs began as what she called sketches, and she tested them with several publishers after the couple came back to England. Rochfort had spent a spell in prison too, at the point Harriette was seeking someone to print her work. She was rejected by all the well-known publishers of the time, those who’d printed Byron and Lady Caroline Lamb… But then Harriette introduced herself to Jospeh Stockdale, a publisher who was a pornographer. He was a man who had a political fire, something against the aristocracy, a desire to be famous and most importantly a need for money… So he grasped at the chance of publishing Harriette’s stories.

We don’t know whether Harriette’s initial intent had been to blackmail people, to buy their names out of her memoirs, but what we do know, is that Stockdale wrote many of the letters still in existence, so the blackmail campaign was a joint affair, run by both ex-courtesan and publisher… They probably hoped to make more from their blackmail than they did the printed version, and we assume then that Stockdale was taking his cut of the blackmail fees… Which we know he agreed with Harriette would be an annuity (an annual payment) of £20-£40 or a one-off sum of £200.

It was also Stockdale’s idea to break the memoirs into a series of releases, that would generate more of a stir and speculation as people wondered what would be included in the next part… A series also helped them to put more pressure upon the men they blackmailed.

Harriette lived with Stockdale, when she wrote the first three parts, with him reading through each piece as she wrote, but the fourth part she returned to Paris and Rochfort to complete. Then the blackmail letters began.

There were several camps… Men who bought themselves out immediately without complaint… Their names we cannot know, and that is the part of her memoirs, which leads many people to believe they are not true at all, because there were certainly considerable omissions.

Then there were the men who refused to be blackmailed and left their names in. Like the Duke of Wellington, who famously said “write and be damned.” Only to later try to sue Harriette and Stockdale. Lord Ponsonby, the man Harriette called her one true love all her life, also refused to be blackmailed.

But then there were those, who rather than buy themselves out, became Harriette’s accomplices to escape becoming the subjects of her kiss and tell tales.

The British Ambassador in Paris, Sir Charles Stuart, let Harriette send part four of her memoirs, along with her blackmail letters to England in the diplomatic bag. Why? Because he was a former lover who did not wish his name mentioned, and Brougham, who was working his way up to become Prime minister took on the role of her legal adviser as well as paying her, and became her puppet for the rest of his life as both she and her new husband continued to blackmail him.

Then there was another camp, those who had never been associated with Harriette, and urged her to write, so they might amuse themselves teasing friends, or attacking political enemies.

Certainly when the first part of Harriette’s memoirs were published in February 1825, some of the most eager to read her work, were the aristocracy. ‘Perhaps you may find time to read this trash,’ wrote Poodle Byng, who was included in it, along with Lord Granville who he wrote to. ‘Not my letter but HW’s memoirs. Heard of it you must – it has caused sensation here and is almost as much talked of as the Mining Shares. Like most other people I suppose you like to see what is said of your relations…

It was said the whole house of Lords, and Parliamentary Cabinet were reading it, in order to look for the names of their colleagues, and several titled men recorded in letters that they were ordering copies to be delivered so they could read it, as soon as each part was published.

Meetings were organised in the men’s clubs, White’s, Brook’s and the United Service Club, solely to discuss what might be done to prevent the publication… But Poodle Byng recorded the outcome of one such meeting, ‘it was determined that nothing in the way of opposition could be done.’ But of course this implies – if these men she had been involved with were so concerned they wished to prevent the publication – that it is likely not all her stores were lies.

The publication of the first part was heralded by a newspaper advertisement mentioning the names of over a dozen noblemen who would be named, and consequently the release was delayed as more men sought to buy themselves out… and one woman… Sophia… Lady Berwick… Harriette’s sister. It is believed she offered Harriette money, but whether it was not enough… (it may have been as Sophia’s husband ended up bankrupt)… or maybe Harriette simply refused to take Sophia out (I will explain why that might be next week) Or perhaps Harriette did take some elements of Sophia’s story out. But for whatever reasons, negotiations delayed the printing of the first part for a whole month, and so it built up a desire from the public to get a hold of it when it was released. It sold out immediately. Although when I say public it’s initial release was aimed at the sort of people Harriette had spent her life mingling with, as at 2 shillings 6d it was beyond to budget of many.

On the back cover of the publication, working the blackmail plan as much as selling copies, there was a list of names in order of rank as who would be mentioned next, and on the front cover the day and hour of the next publication. Which of course was not met as more men sought to buy themselves out.

Lord Craven, who I spoke of last week, of course had not bought himself out, and had the pleasure of facing his name on the opening page.

Apparently Earl Spencer had not just tried to buy himself out, but buy the whole manuscript for £1000. That offer was refused. Harreitte also wanted her revenge and Stockdale wanted fame. They did not just write single letters either though, they continued to urge people. Harriette had written to the Duke of Wellington in the summer, and then there is a letter of Stockdale’s still in existence dated 16th December 1824, to Wellington, warning him again about the stories covered in Harriette’s memoirs.

So were the memoirs finally published truth or lies?

We cannot know for sure exactly how many elements were one hundred percent truth, but what we do know is what was written about Harriette’s memoirs at the time they were printed which imply there were considerable elements of truth.

A magazine of the time, Bell’s Life, published several pieces about the memoirs as they were released, this commented… ‘his Grace the Duke of Wellington, who in conversation with the Duke of York and the Marquis of Hertford a few days back, candidly admitted that some of the stories representing himself were true.”

Frenderick and Charles Bentinck did not buy themselves out, neither did they protest their inclusion, and Charles was recorded as saying, ‘We are all in for it… my brother Frederick and I are in the book up to our necks; but we shall only make bad worse by contending against it; for it is only true, every word of it…

Scott said, ‘though the attempt at wit is very poor that at pathos is sickening… There is a some good retailing of conversations, in which the style of the speakers, so far as is known to me, is exactly imitated, and some things told, as said by individuals of each other, which sound unpleasantly in each other’s ears. I admire the address of Lord A, himself very sorrily handled from time to time. Someone asked him if HW has been pretty correct on the whole. “Why faith,” he replied, “I believe so” – when raising his eyes, he saw Q D, whom the little jilt has treated atrociously – “ what concerns the present company always excerpted, you know,” added Lord A, within infinite presence of mind… After all, HW beats Con Phillips, Anne Bellamy, and all former demireps out and out.’

So from those named there is some recognition of elements of truth.

Certainly we know for sure that one part was true… She refused Lord Ponsonby’s annuity when he offered it on their separation.

Lord Ponsonby was a man who kept his letters, and there is one from Harriette blackmailing him, dated August 1825. He had been abroad, and returned to find his name included in Harriette’s memoirs. Whether he would have chosen to buy himself out or not before they were published, we don’t know, but we do know he did not reply to her when she did blackmail him. He was staying with the Duke of Argyll when he received the letter, another of Harriette’s old flames included in the book. The fact that these men were all friends and stood against her, I am sure must have hurt.

But she did have something very strong over Lord Ponsonby, he had been indiscreet during their affair, trusting her with stories of his former relationship with the Countess of Clare, and with letters from Lady Conyngham, who was now the King’s mistress. Harriette had kept the letters.

This is what she wrote to Lord Ponsonby, the man who was without doubt, the love of her life…

You must be sensible that I have no reason to make you an exception if I show up others (I think there should be a comma here, but there isn’t in the letter) for you as yet done me only harm – The pirates have spoiled our prospect of Memoirs so far I have sold the copyright of what is in Stockdale’s hands namely 18 parts – the rest I publish on my own account – I am sure the stories you recalled to me of Lady Clare and Lady C were such as you do not wish to be published – neither do I wish to publish them – I never broke my word to you or any body – let me be grateful to you for something before I die that I may remember you with kindness – I am printing in Paris at my own expense – Can you afford to send me two hundred pounds? If you assure me upon your honour that 200 is more than you can afford  I will be satisfied with one. I leave all to your good heart if it is good and I hope you remember me with good will – I shall like one simple proof of it and all things considered shall be furious if I do not get it.

Pray answer directly for your own sake – I shall be very sorry if you don’t for it really is (this word was illegible) that you and I should be otherwise than friends… a la distance.

Yours

Harriette Rochfort

Pray don’t put off money till the last part of Memoirs are in press –

The story you told me of ravishing Lady Clare behind the door and breaking a blood vessel etc. will be fine fun for all but the lady and son… I do not wish to hurt you but then you ought to serve me. I returned you a draft you wrote for me surely you may send me what was mine and tended to me by you – I had not returned it had I not loved you, n’est ce pas?’

On the back of Harriette’s letter pleading recompense for the draft she returned to him, when they separated, and claiming love. Lord Ponsonby had simply written ‘This most infamous lying letter was taken no notice of by me.’

The result of this danger, and blackmail threat, was that the King himself, ensured Lord Ponsonby was sent abroad again. He was given a political post in Brazil.

We also know that Harriette’s sister Fanny’s lover, Colonel Parker, was real, only he was in fact a Captain not a Colonel but his surname was Parker.

As the memoirs came out, initially they generated a renewed fame and excitement for Harriette, but very quickly the men she wrote about joined together against her, submitting law suits and ridiculing everything she said. Then Julia Storer, her former comrade and friend published her reply and called the whole thing lies, although it is not even really know if it was Julia who published the response or someone pretending to be her, and Julia’s completely opposite tales actually deny many things in Harriette’s memoirs known to be fact. In answer, Harriette killed off poor Julia, at the end of her memoirs, even though she did know that Julia had not died then. It was a way of mocking her former friend. That part definitely was a lie.

As for the whole truth… That we will never know… Or maybe never know… Apparently the publisher, Stockdale’s wife, is known, after his death, to have offered a full manuscript, showing all deletions with them only crossed out but clearly legible, to one of the noble Lords included. There is no knowing if someone else bought it. Perhaps it was bought and destroyed, or may be it will turn up in the attic of a stately home one day, and then we will know it all in Harriette’s original words, with no deletions.  🙂

There is one horrible truth I know she kept out of her book though…  I will share it next week.

~

Jane Lark is a writer of authentic, passionate and emotional Historical and New Adult Romance stories, and the author of a No.1 bestselling Historical Romance novel in America, ‘The Illicit Love of a Courtesan’.

Look at the index to discover all the true stories Jane has discovered during research, and to find links to excerpts and a FREE novella ~ A Lord’s Desperate Love

Click here to find out more about Jane’s books, and see Jane’s website www.janelark.co.uk to learn more about Jane. Or click  ‘like’ on Jane’s Facebook  page to see photo’s and learn historical facts from the Georgian, Regency and Victorian eras, which Jane publishes there. You can also follow Jane on twitter at @janelark